How to check model’s accuracy using Cross Validation in Python
When building a machine learning model, it’s important to evaluate its accuracy to make sure it’s performing well. One technique for doing this is called cross-validation.
Cross-validation is a method that allows to test the model’s accuracy by dividing the data into several parts, training the model on some of the parts and evaluating it on the others.
In Python, the library scikit-learn provides an easy way to perform cross-validation using the cross_val_score function.
After that, you can use the cross_val_score function to evaluate the model’s accuracy. The function takes the model, the dataset, and the number of folds (parts) you want to divide the data into. The function returns an array of scores, where each score represents the accuracy of the model on one fold.
It’s also worth mentioning that, you can use ‘cv’ parameter that takes the number of splits you would like to make, or an iterable that you can use to define the splits.
Finally, you can use the mean() method to calculate the average accuracy of the model, this gives an overall measure of the model’s performance.
In summary, cross-validation is a powerful technique for evaluating the accuracy of a machine learning model. By using the cross_val_score function in scikit-learn, it’s easy to perform cross-validation in Python, making it a valuable tool for data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
Disclaimer: The information and code presented within this recipe/tutorial is only for educational and coaching purposes for beginners and developers. Anyone can practice and apply the recipe/tutorial presented here, but the reader is taking full responsibility for his/her actions. The author (content curator) of this recipe (code / program) has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information was correct at time of publication. The author (content curator) does not assume and hereby disclaims any liability to any party for any loss, damage, or disruption caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from accident, negligence, or any other cause. The information presented here could also be found in public knowledge domains.